Why Every Crypto Cycle Breaks When the 50-Week Moving Average Closes Below Support — and Why We Might Still Get a Near-Term Bounce
- Jim Wells

- Sep 27, 2025
- 6 min read
Updated: Oct 13, 2025

In technical and on-chain analysis circles, there’s a compelling but under-appreciated timing rule: a crypto cycle tends to end when the 50-week moving average (50 W MA) closes for two consecutive weeks below a designated “support band.” In practice, if that signal ever triggers, it often marks the final capitulation of remaining longs and the transition into a bearish regime. Today, with the 50-week MA hovering around $100,000 (for a basket proxy, or say the broader crypto index equivalent), it’s useful to explore why this pattern shows up, how it forces liquidation cascades, and—paradoxically—why there might still be room for a counter-move over the next couple of months if macro conditions cooperate.
The mechanics: why a 2-week break below support ends the cycle
To understand the logic, break it down in three pieces: (1) what the 50W MA and “support band” represent, (2) what happens when price closes below them, and (3) how that induces a final flush of leveraged longs.
1. The 50-week MA as a backbone indicator
The 50W MA is a slow, long-term trend reference; it smooths out noise and tends to underlie multi-year price structure.
In bullish cycles, price often oscillates above this MA, treating it (or a band around it) as structural support.
The “support band” might be defined as a buffer zone around that 50W line — for example ±5-10%, or a volatility-adjusted envelope. As long as price remains within or above that band, the trend is still considered intact.
2. The meaning of a weekly close below that band
A single weekly close below the band may be seen as a warning: a momentary weakness or shakeout.
But a second consecutive weekly close confirms that the structural support has been breached. In trend analysis, two confirmations often make a shift more credible.
That breach signals to serious participants (especially those with longer time horizons) that the trend’s “backbone” is compromised.
3. The domino: liquidation cascades and forced unwinds
Once price decisively breaks below that support band for two weeks, several interlocking forces tend to trigger:
Liquidated longs: Many traders use leverage or margin with stop-losses just below key support zones. A sustained weekly breach eats through stop orders and forces margin calls, pushing many long positions (especially highly leveraged ones) to be liquidated.
Weak hands exit: Beyond pure forced liquidations, more cautious or risk-averse holders see that structural support is gone and begin trimming or selling, exacerbating the downward pressure.
Shorts pile in, crowd turns negative: Once the signal is confirmed, sentiment typically flips decisively bearish, inviting more short-selling and reducing buying bids.
Capitulation extension: What might have been a moderate correction accelerates, as the market attempts to discover a new bottom.
In past cycles, this dynamic often marks the end of the upside phase and the start of a sustained downtrend. Once a trend’s “floor” is broken in this way, few major participants stick around to defend it.
Why, right now, the 50W MA is around 100K (in our aggregate view) — and what that implies
Let’s be clear: “50W MA ~ 100K” is a working assumption or stylized benchmark (for an index or aggregate crypto valuation). If indeed the 50-week line is resting near 100,000, then:
That level becomes psychologically and technically significant: if price begins to slip below ~100K for two straight weekly closes, that’s the trigger zone for cycle termination.
Many derivatives desks and institutions could be monitoring this level closely — putting their protective hedges, stop losses, or warnings around it.
So long as price remains above that (~100K) or within a buffer margin above it, the cycle’s structure is still alive.
Thus, the next few weeks are critical. If crypto (or the index in question) can dance above or around that level without sustained closure below it, the trend might yet persist. But once it fails, the path downward can become self-fulfilling.
Liquidations of longs: the fuel for the final collapse
A central reason this 2-week closure trigger works so reliably is that it taps into the embedded leverage in the ecosystem. Here’s how:
Excessive leverage near topsIn bull cycles, many participants become overconfident and overleverage, expecting corrections to be shallow. As price rises, new entrants tend to use margin or derivatives to amplify gains. This builds a latent “liquidation risk ceiling.”
Clustering of stops below structural zonesBecause human traders tend to place stop-losses just under support levels, when price breaks structural bands (like the 50 W MA band), those stops get tripped. The first wave of liquidations weakens the bid side further.
Cascade feedback loopsLiquidations force selling, pushing price lower, which triggers more stops and margin calls. The cascade accelerates downward momentum.
Crowd psychology shiftOnce structural support is lost, fear spreads. Even unleveraged holders rush for exits. That pushes prices further, reinforcing the contraction.
Therefore, the 2-week break is not just symbolic: it often aligns with the moment when the network of leveraged long positions cracks wide open.
But wait — what about the macro tailwinds that could brighten the next two months?
It might seem perverse: if the cycle is so fragile near 100K, how could we still expect a bullish push in the near term? The answer lies in macro liquidity, shifting capital flows, and favorable conditions that can temporarily stem the downtrend—or even force a short-term rebound — before the larger trend resumes. Below are a few plausible supporting factors:
1. Central bank easing or dovish pivots
If global monetary policy loosens (e.g. signaling rate cuts, or reducing quantitative tightening), capital may again flood into risk assets—including crypto. Lower discount rates improve the appeal of digital assets as alternative stores or “carry” plays.
2. Fiscal stimulus or sector-specific incentives
New fiscal packages, government infrastructure allocations, or regulation favorable to crypto (e.g. more clarity, safer custody regimes) can inject fresh demand or confidence.
3. Institutional flows and narrative momentum
Because crypto is increasingly tied to institutional interest, large capital allocations or endorsements from major funds or corporations can shift the weight of capital flows. In a transitional period, institutions may rotate capital back in to defend certain levels or capitalize on weakness.
4. Technical overshoot and bounce potential
Sometimes, after an initial break, oversold conditions and short covering can force a snap-back rally—especially in a world where many traders anticipate exactly such a move. Thus, even if the structural trend is weakening, short-term countertrend rallies are possible.
5. Seasonal and sentiment factors
Crypto markets have shown seasonal patterns (e.g. “Uptober,” “November strength,” etc.). If the calendar and sentiment align, those seasonal tailwinds may lend support during a vulnerable period.
Thus, while the structural 50W MA break is ominous, the next 6–8 weeks might still see a bounce or stall as macro and capital flows exert influence.
What to watch: key signals, risk thresholds, and possible paths forward
To convert this framework into a practical monitoring plan, focus on:
Weekly closes relative to the 50W MA band
If one week closes below, it’s a warning flare
If two consecutive weeks close below, the cycle termination signal is triggered
Derivative metrics
Long liquidation volume and forced close metrics
Open interest and funding rates (to detect overleveraging)
Long vs. short ratios
Macro announcements
Central bank guidance, rate decisions, liquidity injections
Fiscal policies and regulatory news around crypto
Volume and institutional flows
Are large inflows or outflows happening?
Are institutional or ETF desks buying or selling?
Sentiment and seasonal context
Is the mood shifting toward fear or optimism?
Are we entering historically strong months?
Possible scenarios
Scenario A: Break confirmedTwo weekly closes below ~100K support band. Long liquidations cascade. The trend becomes strongly bearish, and we settle into a multi-week or multi-month downtrend.
Scenario B: Temporary breach, bounce backOne weekly close dips below support, triggers some liquidation, but a strong rebound (supported by macro or institutional flows) recovers above the band. The cycle continues—though now more fragile.
Scenario C: Grinding sideways near supportPrice hovers around the band, oscillating above and below, neither confirming a break nor resuming strong uptrend. This is the “distribution / battle zone” regime, often preceding a directional breakout.
Scenario D: Re-acceleration upward Macro tailwinds and fresh capital cause a break upward, reaffirming that support and extending the bull trend—though this is riskier and depends heavily on external support.
Conclusion
The idea that every crypto cycle ends when the 50-week moving average closes for two straight weeks below its support band is not mystical — it leverages the interplay of structural trend, leverage fragility, and crowd behavior. Once that backbone breaks, the market often loses its footing, long positions get purged, and a bear regime asserts itself.
That said, with the 50W MA currently near $100,000 (by our working proxy), we are in a precarious zone. A sustained break would likely signal a cycle top and a descent. But in the meantime, macro liquidity, institutional capital flows, and potential seasonal tailwinds may still allow for a bounce or at least a pause in the descent over the next two months.
Ultimately, the ball is in price’s court: if it can’t hold above that support band on a weekly basis, the door to a new downtrend swings open. But the presence of macro or capital influx factors means we must stay vigilant, not assume inevitability.




Comments